Working Papers

Insurance versus Moral Hazard in Income-Contingent Student Loan Repayment
Revise and Resubmit at The Quarterly Journal of Economics
[+] Summary

Student loans with income-contingent repayment insure borrowers against income risk but can reduce their incentives to earn more. Using a change in Australia's income-contingent repayment schedule, I show that borrowers reduce their labor supply to lower their repayments. These responses are larger among borrowers with more hourly flexibility, a lower probability of repayment, and tighter liquidity constraints. I use these responses to estimate a dynamic model of labor supply with frictions that generate imperfect adjustment. My estimates imply that the labor supply responses to income-contingent repayment decrease the optimal amount of insurance in government-provided student loans. However, these responses are too small to justify fixed repayment contracts: restructuring student loans from fixed repayment to a constrained-optimal income-contingent loan increases borrower welfare by the equivalent of a 1.3% increase in lifetime consumption at no additional fiscal cost.

Losing is Optional: Retail Option Trading and Expected Announcement Volatility
with Eric C. So and Kevin C. Smith
Revise and Resubmit at the Review of Finance
[+] Appendix

We document the growth of retail options trading and provide evidence that retail investors are drawn to options by anticipated spikes in volatility. Retail investors purchase options in a concentrated fashion before earnings announcements, particularly those with greater expected abnormal volatility. Comparing across asset markets, we also find retail investors disproportionately trade options over stocks as anticipated announcement volatility increases. In doing so, retail investors display a trio of wealth-depleting behaviors: they overpay for options relative to realized volatility, incur enormous bid-ask spreads, and sluggishly respond to announcements. These translate to retail losses of 5-to-9% on average, and 10-to-14% for high expected volatility announcements.

Expectation Formation with Fat-Tailed Processes: Evidence and Theory
with Eugene Larsen-Hallock, Adam Rej, and David Thesmar

This paper studies expectations formation when the underlying process has fat tails. Using a large sample of firm sales growth expectations, we document three facts: (i) the relationship between forecast revisions and future forecast errors is strongly non-linear, (ii) the distribution of sales growth has fat tails, and (iii) extreme values of sales growth tend to mean-revert. We formally show that these three facts are consistent with a model in which the underlying process is non-Gaussian, but forecasters fail to recognize this fully. We estimate this model and show it quantitatively explains our three facts. Finally, we show the model is consistent with evidence from an online forecasting experiment where the underlying process is non-Gaussian and the non-linearity in the momentum of stock returns.

Selective Inattention to Interest Rates
with Pierfrancesco Mei

This paper studies whether households are selectively inattentive to interest rates and examines its macroeconomic implications. We first use existing and newly-designed household surveys to establish that households close to durables purchases actively acquire more information about interest rates and have more accurate, less dispersed, and less uncertain interest rate expectations. Next, we use this evidence to calibrate an incomplete markets model with durable consumption and endogenous information acquisition about interest rates through rational inattention. Finally, we quantify how selective inattention changes aggregate consumption responses to interest rates. Relative to exogenous inattention, selective inattention shifts the composition of spending responses to interest rate cuts, accelerates the impact of larger cuts, and generates dampened responses to changes in volatility that are closer to empirical evidence.

Model-Agnostic Dynamic Programming
with Marc de la Barrera
[+] Python Package

Traditional dynamic programming requires a mathematical model of the transition function for the state vector. Leveraging reinforcement learning techniques, we develop a framework to solve dynamic optimization problems that does not require modeling the data-generating process (DGP) of exogenous states. Instead, the method samples realizations of these states directly from the data, allowing the modeler to be "agnostic" about the DGP. We apply our method to a canonical life cycle consumption-saving problem, solving the model without specifying the DGP for income. Using income data from the CPS, we find that the welfare loss from using a standard parametric income process relative to placing no restrictions on the DGP is small. We conclude by verifying that our method achieves a global optimum when given a known DGP and discussing directions for future work.

Publications

What Drives Investors' Portfolio Choices? Separating Risk Preferences from Frictions
with Taha Choukhmane
Journal of Finance, Forthcoming
[+] Summary

We study the role of risk preferences and frictions in portfolio choice using variation in 401(k) default options. Patterns of active choice in response to different default funds imply that, absent participation frictions, 94% of investors prefer holding stocks, with an equity share of retirement wealth declining with age—patterns markedly different from observed allocations. We use this quasi-experiment to estimate a life cycle model and find a relative risk aversion of 2, EIS of 0.4, and $200 portfolio adjustment cost. Our results suggest that low levels of stock market participation in retirement accounts are due to participation frictions rather than non-standard preferences such as loss-aversion.

Noise in Expectations: Evidence from Analyst Forecasts
with David Thesmar
Review of Financial Studies, 2024
[+] Appendix [+] Code [+] Summary

Analyst forecasts outperform econometric forecasts in the short run but underperform in the long run. We decompose these differences in forecasting accuracy into analysts’ information advantage, forecast bias, and forecast noise. We find that noise and bias strongly increase with forecast horizon, while analysts’ information advantage decays rapidly. A noise increase with horizon generates a mechanical reversal in the sign of the error-revision (Coibion--Gorodnichenko) regression coefficient at longer horizons, independently of over/underreaction. A parsimonious model with bounded rationality and a noisy cognitive default matches the term structures of noise and bias jointly.

Older Publications

Are Volatility Expectations in Different Countries Interdependent?
Undergraduate Economic Review, 2017

Over the past couple of decades, the number of volatility indices has increased rapidly. Although the dynamics of realized volatility spillover have been studied extensively, very few studies exist that examine the spillover between these implied volatility indices. By using DAG-based structural vector autoregression, this paper provides evidence that implied volatility spillover differs from realized volatility spillover. This paper finds that Asia, more specifically Hong Kong, plays a central role in implied volatility spillover during and after the 2008 financial crisis.

Is Google Search Behavior Related to Volatility?
Undergraduate Economic Review, 2016

Intuitively, one would expect that internet search volume would contain valuable information about investor sentiment for a company. With the development of new data sources, such as Google Trends, this relationship can be more easily and objectively examined. This paper seeks to examine the relationship between a company’s stock price volatility and its Google search volume. A small cross-section of twenty companies is considered, and the goal of this paper is to demonstrate the power of Google Trends data in hope of initiating further research. Using a conventional GARCH framework for financial market volatility, an economically and statistically significant contemporaneous relationship between Google search volume and equity volatility is found.